Is a signed document legally binding? Understanding your agreement’s validity

Understanding your agreement’s validity

Whether you’re buying a new house or starting a new job, signing a contract can be a life-changing event. As exciting as it is, however, it’s natural to worry about whether the agreement is watertight. 

After all, in today’s age of digital transformation, questions surrounding the legality of signed documents have become more complex and nuanced than ever. Understanding the intricacies of what makes a signed document legally binding is crucial for individuals and businesses alike.

What’s your type?

Though this blog focuses on electric signatures, it’s worth exploring that the legal validity of contracts can carry different considerations based on signature type.

Traditional, handwritten signatures, often referred to as "wet signatures," hold a historical and universally recognized status. Courts have consistently acknowledged the legal validity of wet signatures, considering them as tangible evidence of a person's intent to be bound by an agreement.

In fact, many legal systems have statutes and regulations that explicitly recognize the validity of handwritten signatures. These laws often provide a framework for the acceptance of traditional signatures in various legal transactions.

More recently, digital technology has given rise to electronic signatures, encompassing a broad spectrum of methods such as typed names, scanned signatures, and more advanced cryptographic signatures. While legislations like the ESIGN Act recognize the validity of electronic signatures, the level of legal acceptance can vary depending on the specific method used.

To address concerns about the security and integrity of electronic signatures, some legislations, such as eIDAS in the EU, distinguish between electronic signatures and advanced electronic signatures. Advanced electronic signatures often involve additional security features and are granted a higher level of legal presumption.

In fact, electronic signatures have become so advanced that they can carry more legal weight in court cases. That’s because an audit trail can determine where the document was signed, from which device, and at what time. Essentially, it does most of the investigating for you.

Laying the foundation

The law has largely been laid for electronic contracts, with their legality largely having been established in many jurisdictions around the world. In most cases, electronic contracts are generally considered legally binding provided they meet the necessary requirements and comply with relevant legislation.

Legal systems around the world generally fall into two main categories: common law and civil law. Common law systems, including the United States and the United Kingdom, rely on precedent and case law to interpret and develop contract law. Civil law systems, prevalent in continental Europe, derive principles from comprehensive legal codes.

In the U.S, the legal foundation for electronic contracts can be traced back to the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce (ESIGN) Act and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA). These legislations establish the validity of electronic signatures and contracts, emphasizing the importance of consent and the manifestation of intent in the digital realm.

In the European Union, the eIDAS (Electronic Identification, Authentication and Trust Services) Regulation provides a legal framework for electronic transactions, including contracts. It sets standards for electronic signatures, ensuring their recognition and acceptance across EU member states.

Case by case

The legality of signed documents can also vary by industry. 

In real estate, for example, contracts, involving significant financial transactions, are subject to stringent legal requirements. Compliance with the Statute of Frauds and adherence to specific real estate laws are essential for the legality of these contracts.

Meanwhile, contracts between employers and employees govern the terms of employment. Ensuring that these contracts comply with labor laws, including minimum wage and working conditions, is crucial for their legality.

Then we have the complexities of international contracts. Cross-border transactions involve complexities related to different legal systems and jurisdictions. International contracts must carefully consider applicable laws, dispute resolution mechanisms, and compliance with international trade regulations.

Intent, consent and capacity

At the core of any legally binding agreement is the concept of legal intent. A signed document is essentially an expression of the parties involved that they intend to be bound by the terms outlined within. Whether it's a traditional ink-on-paper signature or a digital counterpart, the key factor is the clear manifestation of an agreement between the parties to be legally bound.

Consent is another fundamental and critical element of any reputable contract. In a legal context, consent refers to the voluntary and mutual agreement of all parties involved in a contract to the terms and conditions laid out in the agreement. 

For a contract to be legally binding, there must be a meeting of the minds, indicating that all parties involved have agreed to the same terms. This mutual assent is a key component in the formation of a valid contract because it ensures that the parties enter into the contract willingly and without coercion. If a party is forced or pressured into an agreement against their will, the contract may be deemed voidable.

Legal systems typically prioritize fairness and the protection of parties' rights when assessing the validity of consent in contracts.

Another factor that comes into play is a legal term called consideration, which refers to something of value exchanged between the parties, forming the basis of the contract. In many legal systems, a contract without consideration may be deemed unenforceable. Parties must receive something of value or bear a legal detriment to create a binding contract.

Finally, whether it’s a wet or electronic signature, the parties entering into an agreement must have the legal capacity to do so. This implies that they are of sound mind, not under duress, and are voluntarily entering into the contract. Without genuine consent, a contract may be voidable.

Contesting a contract

This brings us to our next point: Contracts can be contested under various circumstances. Grounds for doing so typically involve legal principles, violations, or defects that may render the contract voidable or unenforceable.

‍

This could include mental incapacity or contracts involving minors, or even something as simple as the contract containing an error.  The reasons for voiding a contract aren’t always so innocent, however, with fraud and misrepresentation serving as other causes for the agreement being shredded.

Contracts can also be deemed illegal if they’re illegal or against public policy, or in the case of a breach of contract. 

It's important to note that contesting a contract may involve legal proceedings, and the outcome will depend on the specific circumstances, applicable laws, and evidence presented. Individuals seeking to contest a contract should consult with legal professionals to assess the viability of their case and understand the available legal remedies.

The Future of Contract Legality

The rise of blockchain technology has given birth to smart contracts—self-executing contracts with terms written in code. Smart contracts hold the potential to automate and streamline contractual processes while ensuring transparency and security.

In fact, the integration of artificial intelligence in contract review is becoming a trend. AI tools can analyze and extract key information from contracts, enhancing efficiency and reducing the risk of human error.

It's important to note that the legal landscape is continually evolving, and the future of digital contracts will be influenced by technological advancements, regulatory developments, and societal acceptance. Organizations and legal professionals will need to stay informed and adapt to changes in order to navigate the complexities of digital contracting effectively.

The verdict

From ancient civilizations using seals to the wax seals of medieval times, signatures as a form of authentication have deep historical roots. Nevertheless, the principles remain rooted in the same essential elements of offer, acceptance, and mutual intent. As society continues to evolve, so too will the legal frameworks that govern contracts, adapting to emerging technologies and global complexities. 

Navigating this intricate web requires not only a grasp of legal principles but also an awareness of industry-specific regulations and an openness to the innovations that shape the future of contractual legality.

‍

Popular e-signature providers like BlueInk help take out the guesswork. Its electronic document signing process is legally valid and court-admissible, and complies with U.S. and most global standards. Learn more here.

‍