By BlueInk | 4-28-2023 | Business Process
As our world continues to digitize, an increasing number of businesses and organizations are adopting electronic signatures to optimize their document workflows. However, some may question whether electronic signatures are genuinely more eco-friendly than traditional paper signatures. In this article, we will examine the environmental effects of both paper and electronic signatures and evaluate which method is more sustainable.
Traditional paper signatures necessitate printing, mailing, and physically storing documents, which can have a considerable impact on the environment. Here are some ways in which paper signatures affect the environment:
In contrast, electronic signatures require no paper or physical storage, as they are stored electronically and can be accessed and signed from anywhere with an internet connection. Here are some ways electronic signatures impact the environment:
Blueink is an e-signature solution offering various features to help businesses and organizations lessen their environmental impact. Here are some ways Blueink contributes to sustainability:
Ultimately, electronic signatures, such as those provided by Blueink, are more environmentally friendly than traditional paper signatures. Electronic signatures decrease paper usage, energy consumption, water usage, and waste. By adopting electronic signatures, businesses and organizations can significantly reduce their environmental impact while enhancing their document workflows.
